Quantum
Field science is a terminology given to a new type of physical
science that completely replaces the current atomic model allowing
the possibility of explaining all actions and functions including
anomalies and chaotic functionality.
Current theories give the user the ability to mathematically
explain the functionality of certain aspects of the known universe,
but fail to anticipate and/or explain seemingly random chaotic
functions that occur. The reason for this is that the base construct
that is currently seen as the foundation of existence is in
fact incorrect, in the sense that function, energy and matter
are seen as separate entities that co-exist rather than being
seen as the same “material” viewed from differing
perspectives.
The existence of atoms, protons, neutrons, electrons and all
other hypothetical particles within the physical realm has never
been proven to exist, but still to this day are used as the
solid foundation for all matter and functions throughout the
known universe. Aspects such as environment are limited to the
immediate vicinity while contraindications that occur throughout
the intended function are viewed as “side effects”
and/or “random variations” and hence ignored or
given the application of an etheric formula or fabricated function
in order to compensate for the irregularity in the integrity
of the progression of the event.
This
new model/concept begins at the very core of simplicity itself,
and is an explanation to not only physical matter, but to the
functions, reactions, interactions and complex procedures that
occur throughout nature that range from the simplest physical
reaction through to the complexity of the human biomass. Many
of these events throughout our universe are not explainable,
with the use of current concepts, by any one doctrine or philosophy.
Several are usually needed to generate a hypothesis of the action
based purely on postulated supposition and conjecture of the
occurrences surrounding an event from a biased objective view.
This statement is not intended to ridicule the sciences, but
allow them to see that the “third person” perspective
based system of analysis is no longer a valid method of discerning
a viable solution nor is it an efficient use of time and resources
when attempting to predetermine an accurate outcome to an event
or function.
Many of the current theories surrounding the physical universe
contain exceptions to the rule and have anomalies surrounding
them that contravene their existence. It is mainly due to the
complexity and multitude of these various theorems that leads
to their eventual extinction, but in order to maintain their
integrity, each in turn will be used to support the other in
such a fashion as to generate a circular argument or function
that relies upon the existence of proof of another presumption.
Unfortunately, this only leads to the creation of a hypothetical
universe, which is only one percent effective and useful in
the real universe.
Particles
and Waves
My knowledge of current theories and methodology is limited
to basics of the philosophy for that is all that should be required
from a concept to establish an individual knowledge base from
the first person.
Classic
physics denotes that the universe is made up of particles ranging
from atoms and molecules through to quarks and neutrinos. These
particles have physical size and weight, as does a grain of
sand on the beach, implying that the beach is a solid singular
object and a grain of sand is a representation of one of an
almost infinite number of molecules that makes up the entire
object. Each molecule contains the parts, components and three-dimensional
pattern that make up the entire object as a singular mass.
Chemistry can give us the make-up of the object, but cannot
give us the spatial geometry. Physics can give us reactance
to the object from exterior sources, which tells us how the
object interacts with our physical universe, but still cannot
give us certain answers.
Geometry can give us the physical shape and dimensions but in
the end none of the current doctrines can give us the one single
thing that is required to truly understand, which is what the
object actually is.
Waves, on the other hand, can give us the resultant effect of
the object's interaction with its surrounding environment, which
is then discerned as the object's signature. If an object is
interacted with by another object or effect, it will exhibit
and emit a waveform effect that is based on the object's source
signature (that is -- the innate emanation of the compounded
vibrations emitting from the individual components that make
up the object) or global MRF (Magnetic Resonance Frequency)
and the waveform pattern used to create the desired response
from the object.
To coin an analogy, if you throw a pebble into a pond, the resultant
waves display the effect of the object on its surroundings.
The closer of these two scientific concepts would have to be
“waves” since the resultant fluctuation of effect
generated by the object is seen as a “magnetic”
effect in nature and not considered as solid mass or matter
in respect to what is called solid.
The only step that the wave theory has not taken is to remove
the particle theory from the equation and base the initial calculations
on an existent compound mass as a “wave” based function/event
instead of a particle discerned format that is “seen”
to generate waveform emissions. The angle of thought required
to approach this subject is to see the emitter itself as a function/event
that evolves with and conforms to the restrictions and capabilities
of its environment and surroundings. The emitter itself is an
emission as such generated by the action of both its own construct
and that which developed it as an outcome event. (ps…this
is not a “chicken and the egg” theory since the
former and later are both a construct of corporeal fields).
The point that I am attempting to make here is not to ridicule
the doctrines, but to show that the perspective view of a substance/object/function/event
can only show an outcome in reference to the voyeur. The substance/object/function/event
cannot be set a series of guidelines and parameters based on
what the voyeur requires. The substance/object/function/event
has its own parameters in reference to itself and its surroundings
based on what it is, where, when, how and why and also in which
sequence of already existent events it is currently involved
in.
Physics
of the Field
A “field” is currently described as an emanation
of an object of substance that is the resultant effect of the
material of the substance or interaction with another object
of same, similar, or differing compound.
In short, a field is that which surrounds.
This is not exactly correct.
A field, in the Q Mechanics terminology is that which “is”.
The substance / object as it is without any exterior interaction
from other sources. That which makes up the material or the
object contains a pattern or signature that designates what
it is, where it is, when, how and why.
A field or signature of an object is a culmination of many constituents
and/or actions/functions that make it up. These constituents
are not physical matter as we know it, but in fact are the actions/functions
that interact with each other to develop an evolvement of what
is considered as physical matter or particle form. The evolvement
is established by the interaction of two or more actions in
an immediate environmental medium. In any functional equation
we have a minimum of 3 constituents to produce an action.
Three
– Four Base Table
The 3-4 base table is a simplistic method of how to explain
the action, function and interaction of the base “elemental”
signatures that make up a complex signature or Global Resonance
Signature. This GRS is the representative pattern format of
an actual physical piece of solid matter, which means that it
is actually the physical piece of solid matter and not just
a function generated by its existence within an environment.
In
order to explain this core/base fundamental action (3-4 base
table), The labels of “Alpha”, “Beta”
and “Gamma” will be given to the three core functions.
“Alpha” will represent the first action/function,
“Beta” will represent the second and “Gamma”
will be the medium/environment.
Mathematical Extrapolation of the Function
of a “Delta” Point or Function
After the “Delta” evolves, it becomes the
“Alpha” or “Beta” of the next evolutionary
function in the chain of events that occur to formulate the
pattern construct of an action / function / object / environment.
The
Delta becomes the next Alpha or Beta
This action/function of the 3-4 is not bound to the linear progression
of time even though time plays an important part in the evolvement
of the global event. The timing of the interactions is based
upon the formulated strategy of the environment verses the constituency
of the interactions in relation to the events that within and
surrounding the currently observed event.
Each
Delta event does not necessarily have to become a base function
of the next event. This is what creates an event sequence in
that the Delta events that do not evolve to the next function
become signature markers for the progression of the creation
of a “Delta Bar” or singular individual marker aspect
of the GRS.
As
can be seen above, the 3 different event sequences look different,
but in fact they are the same event sequence seen from 3 differing
perspectives.
The
event sequence or Delta sequence is in fact far more detailed
and complex than is shown above, but for explanation purposes,
the diagrams will be kept simple so as to be understood.
The
Delta sequence that is shown on the left is a representation
of a more complex and detailed function / event.
The picture on the right represents a combination of these events
or Delta sequences that is referred to as a MATRIX. This combination
depicts a complete Delta function, which is the Culmination
of all of the individual events giving rise to Stage 1 of a
GRS.
The
image below is a simplified version of the MATRIX shown as such
so as to allow for the representation of the Delta sequences
to be displayed as differing from each other.
Each Delta Event Sequence is different in that the size/intensity,
position, rotation, vector angle and direction of focus vary
from Delta Point to Delta Point thus creating a seemingly random
and chaotic construct. The randomness of the sequence is in
fact ordered and follows a specific design depending upon the
material or action / function of the final GRS.
The
next stage in the construction is to interact several of these
matrices together so as to generate a larger and more complex
signature base. Stage 2 (as seen below) is the visual representation
of the next level of evolvement.
Once
again the apparent randomness of the construct can be seen in
the pictures above and below, but in fact there is a specific
pattern evolving that can be extrapolated from the matrix through
to the solid mass. This pattern is the emergence of what is
referenced as a “signature” of the substance/object/function/event.
The individual matrices interact with each other, not as separate
entities as is depicted above, but as an individual mass that
is in a virtual liquid state of both motion and function. Interactions
and evolving functions are not bound to each point but are still
bound by the constraints of the pre-existent evolvement of the
delta construct as such.
If we “zoom out”, it can be seen that the matrix
is interacting with itself and integrating to form a pattern
construct. This combination of matrices can be now identified
as a complex pattern that will evolve into a GRS construct.
The
representation of the sphere below is a pictorial representation
of a GRS template of an object / function. All three images
below represent differing visual perspectives of the emission
pattern generated by the GRS. This is what a true “frequency”
of a substance or action / function is. The first is a wire
frame that allows you to still see the functions and interactions
that form the GRS. The second shows the silhouette of the GRS
while still allowing the functions to be seen, while the third
shows the exterior true representation of a frequency in its
entirety. These three representations are still the same object/signature
but have been shown as such to give you a perspective view of
the signature from differing angles of thought.
Below
is a pattern as seen on a 2D imaging system such as a CRO (Cathode
Ray Oscilloscope). This signature/signal of an object/substance/action/function
is an interpolation by a two-dimensional measuring system attempting
to measure a three dimensional situation.
In
order to do this, the device requires a cross-sectional aspect
of the GRS in order to take the measurements of the function.
This cross-section is in a 2D aspect and unfortunately does
not give a true representation of the pattern construct of the
material/function.
(Addendum
Point 1) States of Matter
If the reference of the GRS is taken into consideration,
then the can only be 1 state of matter. Since every event is
constantly in motion and evolving within its own environmental
constraints, and those environments are a function of the outcome
of the previous evolvement, then this can be considered as “fluid”
motion as there are no pauses, stops nor stationary events occurring
within the construct.
The commonly referred to “3 states of matter” are
simply visual aspects of a fluid function based on observer’s
own function being the reference point for the establishment
of the parameters on which the state is being judged. Solid
is still fluid, as is gaseous. These observations are based
on the corporeal existence and function of the observer and
not on the object/function/event itself.
A qualifying example of this is water. When in its natural environmental
state based on its location and functionality, it is liquid.
When heated it vaporizes to steam and when frozen, it solidifies
to ice. As its environment is altered, so is its representative
format in reference to the observer, but it always remains water.
Evolvement
101
From a core GRS, a complex event/function can be formulated
by interacting 2 or more GRS constructs together in an environmental
situation. The equating procedure is identical per evolvement
step irrespective of the size, shape or consistency of the event.
This action holds true throughout all functions. An example
would be in order to joint 2 pieces of steel together, the environment
must include a heat component sufficient enough to destabilize
the functionality of the GRS construct of both materials to
a synchronous point where the 2 combine as a fluid.
If
the Gamma (Environment) is a common or synchronous factor to
the Alpha and Beta alike, then there will be an interaction
between the two actions/materials based on the event process
of the Gamma function.
As
can be seen above, the two elements, once interacted with by
an environmental event that was synchronous to particular aspects
of the differing GRS patterns, developed a combined function
based of the Alpha, Beta and Gamma elements in the equation.
Since evolvement is continually unidirectional, the function
of “undoing” the event is not to do exactly the
“opposite” function in order to separate the two
aspects from each other, but rather to discern the commonality
points of the event sequence that developed the event and apply
a synchronous catalyst and/or function/event sequence that will
evolve the separation of the two substances.
